https://www.iwh.on.ca/what-researchers-mean-by/grounded-theory to work collaboratively with them seeking understandings and insights of their experiences. Boeije, Hennie. (2002). #B00557 - theoretical frameworks will you draw on? Which method will you use to collect data? Data Analysis will focus on patterns of alternative assumptions and themes to what the Author of the text first concluded. Methods will include conceptual and thematic analysis in an Indigenous framework, listening for privilege and power AND alternatives from the original Author perspective. Note that it is possible that a shared understanding of alternate conclusions may be reached even if the individual conclusions themselves differ. Data Collection will be through audio recordings, so as not to interfere with the flow of conversation and any written notes, with permission, of the Investigators. All information, draft and final, will be available to all Participants on the web portal. # content - senior elder and authorisation - reinterpretation .. opening up narratives knowledge practice decolonial practice being accountable for carrying this forward heritage memory share testimony how have you come to this ??? who will it involve - The study uses a participatory methodology (Stille, 2015) to examine four exerts from the book _The Euahlayi Tribe_ (Langloh Parker, 1905) using the four Barriyay Windows. This book was chosen because of its non-indigenous authorship and direct Euahlayi Nation contribution. **Six Investigators** will be recruited through media and community organisations within the nations, Yuwaalaaray, Muruwari, Kooma, Bigambul, Kamilaroi, Baanbinya, Wailwan that surround Bangate Station, the geographic focus of the chosen text. An **Initial Co-Design Workshop** will provide an introduction to the purpose of the study and an outline of the delivery idea so far. It is integral to the study that Investigators know that they are part of a co-investigative relationship with people of today about people of yesterday. A sample dissection from the book will be shared to demonstrate the Barriyay method and an updated delivery and design discussed where necessary. The remaining Research Design may change based on the outcomes of this workshop. **Investigators** will have had a familial relationship with a person [Co-Contributer] who had a familial relationship with an adult Euahlayi Australian alive in the geographic area between 1900 and 1930 [Contributor], **and** are bilingual in Yuwaalaraay and Australian English [to Highschool level], or has an interpreter where comfortable translation is possible **Mid-Collaborations** will include up to six focus groups over a three month period. Groups will begin with Investigators sharing life stories of their Co-Contributor and move to co-research using the Barriyay method. The last session will be a **Reflection Conversation** encompassing a debriefing process and an invitation to contribute to a collective document in recognition of the original Euhalari Contributors. There will also be semi-structured interviews for each individual, using open and closed questions and self rating scales to provide feedback on the process. Much was written about us (the Australian Aboriginal population) before we had a chance to participate, thus the Colonist lens left those scratchings far from complete. Modern re-examinations with an Indigenous lens has acknowledged the absence in original stories of exploitation, genocide and resistance. Now commonly known as "truth telling", this act of honest acknowledgement has helped Aboriginal healing by not only recognising that lies that were told, but that previous labelled acts of Aboriginal compliance were actually forceful unique responses taken by our ancestors to survive. These alternative methodologies have also provided frameworks for Researchers to better engage with Indigenous Participants to promote indigenous voices being heard as they are spoken, rather than words interpreted through a colonised lens. From this engagement, Researchers have been able to base studies on actual community needs, so outcomes can benefit the community and/or the Indigenous population of Australia as a whole. * people always repond/resist in some way * is there evidence of this in the text * questions are to locate a second theme or storyline * process of healing through textual analysis # Aboriginal Participatory Action Research - sharing Circles - limited to studies in this 21st century # interpretive - **Interpretive phenomenology analysis** is the theoretical approach used for this study because it allows the researchers to explore and understand the lived experiences of participants # hartleyBennington - #B00022 is indigenous learning connected to .. next **METHODS:** IN-DEPTH SEMISTRUCTURED INTERVIEWS WITH THEMATIC ANALYSIS WERE UNDERTAKEN TO EXPLORE THE PSYCHOSOCIAL FACTORS EXPERIENCED BY ABORIGINAL AND TORRES STRAIT ISLANDER WOMEN AS THEY MANAGED THEIR CHRONIC DISEASE. AN ‘INDIGENOUS WOMEN’S STANDPOINT THEORY’ APPROACH WAS ADOPTED TO FRAME DISCUSSION. THIS APPROACH GIVES STRENGTH AND POWER TO THE VOICE OF ABORIGINAL AND TORRES STRAIT ISLANDER WOMEN AND THEIR DIVERSE CULTURAL LIVED EXPERIENCES. THE RAW AND OFTEN BRUTAL REALITIES THIS APPROACH EXPOSED HAD A TRIGGERING IMPACT ON THE ABORIGINAL TEAM MEMBER FOR WHOM THESE REALITIES WERE FAMILIAR. INTERVIEWS WERE CONDUCTED WITH PARTICIPANTS FROM FOUR ABORIGINAL MEDICAL SERVICES FROM URBAN, RURAL AND REMOTE AUSTRALIA. ANALYSIS OF THE INTERVIEWS, AND REFLECTION REGARDING THE RESEARCHER’S EXPERIENCES, OCCURRED WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF A MULTIDISCIPLINARY TEAM #B00557